Michael Olivero
The official blog of Michael Olivero, Software Architect & Humble Entrepreneur

Gold - To be or not to be?

Friday, 10 February 2012 08:36 by Michael Olivero
Warren Buffet, a few months back, said if a all the gold in the world were to be combined into a large cube, it would measure a paltry 68 feet wide on each side worth $9.6 trillion. With today's valuation he argued you can do much better things with the value rather than own all this gold.  While true, especially long term, there are a few problems with this statement.  The first problem is, no single entity will ever own all the gold of the world -- if so, then it's value will become immeasurable.
 
While true, the only common variable in question is the valuation of currency.  How do you value gold today?  You compare it to the dollar and it would cost you $1750 to buy an ounce of it.  What happens when the dollar appreciates in value?  Gold, relatively stable in quantity, will have to decrease and vice versa increase if the dollar declines in value.
 
So clearly, the value of the dollar is directly inversely proportional to price of gold -- however this is not the only influencing factor.  Using Buffet's analogy on preferring buying a company producing gobs of profit over a century over buy gold which will sit in a vault may sound reasonable.  A better way to compare this is assume the value of currency goes to near zero because of huge debts (ex Greece currency) then what value will a good company, say in Greece today, producing gobs of profits in say greece's old currency, be worth? Little -- no one would want the greek drachma.  Greece had to increase rates to 10, 20, even 30% to sell bonds to investors - the return had to be sufficient to warrant the risk!
 
From my perspective, born as a US citizen, it's unfathomable but if US debts increase (as projected for the next 10 years) it may loose more of its rating and trust around the world and consequently it's value. The only thing allowing it's value to remain, and interest rates to be low, is the perception of the dollar as the universal global currency. Meaning, when the euro's credibility suffers people run to the dollar -  making bond auctions here relatively cheap from the excess demand.  This demand allows the US to keep rates low or even move them lower as dollar investors would buy the bonds anyhow just for the perceived safety.  This in return, allows the US to have a relatively "free ride" in navigating the financial turmoil by simply selling bonds at auctions as needed to meet liquidity needs to prop up the economy in the form of bailouts and the quantitative easing necessary throughout the later part of the last decade. That is the only reason why the US has been able to leverage low interest rates throughout the deepest recession in my lifetime.  
 
As soon as a world currency steps up as an alternative (what many thought the euro to be at one time) then the dollar will drop precipitously to correct for its over leveraged position.  Some of these concerns are clearly present today although stubbornly subdued due to the dollars prominence world wide.  With deficits expected to increase for the next 10 years, the leveraged position slowly erodes with decreasing value and appreciation similar to Greece's fallout -- although much quicker.  These signs are already present in the current price of the gold and should continue for the intermediate future -- how so you may ask?
 
Since world commodities are priced in dollars like oil and gold, these commodities will inevitably adjust inversely to the dollars movement as mentioned earlier.  To stabalize a currency, traditionally countries buy and amass gold (ex Wikipedia the gold standard for the US). Recently there is a huge movement to acquire gold by many countries for its stabilizing effects. Venezuela is shipping its gold from overseas banks; China has increased it's rate of purchasing and Russia has double it's own too.   Overall it's desire has increased as a simple safe haven when instability exists.
 
In conclusion, long long term, say 100 years like Buffet affirms, yes prosperity and opportunity abounds more than owning some gold, short term however it's use as a safe haven is inevitable as are other world commodities. Personally I prefer oil, it's also priced in dollars and is in demand like gold, however unlike gold, it depletes and produces a tangible value in the form of consumption.  A gallon of gas in 10 years, all things remaining equal, will be higher than the gallon is today - for sure.  Factor in depreciated dollar and a barrel of oil may be $200 -- 100% return over a 10 years.  Why else do you think renewable energy has become a trendy topic in the last few years?
Tags:  
Categories:   Finance | World
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (3) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Is Apple another bargain when the stock opens 6% lower from the previous close?

Wednesday, 19 October 2011 00:05 by Michael Olivero

Imagine if Microsoft, a similarly comparable large company like Apple, would all of a sudden gain 54% in profit. Would its stock tank 5 or 6% because they didn't sell as many licenses of Windows as economists had projected?  No, on the contrary it will rise like 10% on such profound news for typically lethargically large companies of their size.  The funny thing, this is not a one time event, this is a continual event every quarter for sometime now and will continue for a few more as the world settles into the iPad as they did with the iPhone and of course the App Store, the only place you can legitimately buy apps for it, will continue growing too.   The 4th quarter is going to be that much more of a smashing success with iPhone projections as the 3rd quarter wasn't because the sales of iPhones, which dropped in 3rd quarter due to lack of product launch in June, will fall over to 4th quarter from the iPhone 4S product launch.  So of course, when comparing Q3 2011 to Q3 2010, there is inevitably going to be some differences -- especially with the successful iPhone4 being the growth factor then.

To blatantly compare Q3 2011 with Q4 2010 in gross iPhone sales and fuss over the unsatisfied expectations has got to be the most misconstrued news I have ever heard.  This only reinforces Peter Lynch investment style of investing in what you know and you'll beat the analysts every time.  No matter which way you slice it, AAPL has 81 billion in the bank accruing at 6.5 billion per quarter, no debt, 54% increase in profit and product portfolios which are no where near becoming stagnant.  New product revenue lines like App Store, iPad, & strongly increasing revenue from existing product lines like iPhone, MacBook, iTunes (#1 digital music store) -- it's a 100% no brainer this stock will continue to push upwards for the near future.  Any drop should be considered a discounted buying opportunity.  

Oh, and this is before the announcement of their touch based iMacs which will lay slightly inclined on your desk similar to the iPad, still with a slide out keyboard for keyboard dependent apps , and any other new upcoming product line.

I'll write again when the price is at 500 and I'll reassess the situation then to see if we can expect more.  Buying now will give you roughly a 25% return from 400 to 500 within 12 months.

 

 

UPDATE 11/28/2011

Apple Stock today closed at 376.12.  It's an extreme bargain.  I just read various articles which simply justify my gut feeling.  One reported iPhone4S sales so large in Britain, it became the #1 in sales, even beating Andriod -- a feat many people thought was impossible given the diversity of Android devices at various price points.  Another article, states teens have listed iPhone & iPad with the same level of desire as cash and clothes on their holiday wish lists.  Yet, another, from a financial perspective, compares Apple stellar performance in comparison to it's current stock price.  Every financial metric used to value the stock have it as extremely undervalued.  Anyone buying at today's price will reap an easy 30% gain on the way up to 500.  Lets just hope the financial crisis doesn't bring a general recession/depression -- the only thing which could drag down the stock.

My venture in owning a piece of the Apple pie and why you should own it too

Thursday, 5 November 2009 01:05 by Michael Olivero

Prior to the January 2007 announcement of the impending iPhone, I was already a minor shareholder of Apple for their fine set of products.  Ironically, I had not yet owned an Apple product beside a mere iPod nano obtained through a holiday party raffle.  I invested a small amount simply on the news they had decided on switching over to Intel CPU's for their entire product line. The reason was not simply because Intel carries more weight in the industry or because Apple computers are to benefit from the higher processing power of the de facto leader in semi's, but simply because an Apple computer has now become "doubly" valuable when compared to mere PC.  With an Apple computer, I can not only run Apple's OS and all their slick consumer geared applications, but I can also quickly boot over to a full native Windows OS with a simple key press when turning it on.  Initially Apple lacked direct support for such a boot feature and most of the press focused on the ability to virtualize Windows within Mac OS.  Parallels and VMWare Fusion, the two main competing mac virtualization softwares, effortlessly ran to the spotlight as the way to run Windows within a Mac.  Ultimately Apple caught headwind of this frenzy and no more than few months, Mac had native dual boot feature for anyone wanting to run Windows and Mac as a choice with a single button click at boot time. In short, a Mac, all of a sudden, presented a very valuable proposition for any serious Windows user in the market for a new computer. A year or so later, the iPhone is announced.  My gosh, is this thing for real I remember asking myself.  The stock price that day was roughly in the 80's if I recall correctly and had jumped about 8% following the announcement.  While I'm not an investor on day to day news, I am however a long term investor and any news having a definitive impact on longterm will always surely fork me to action.  I was sold from the moment jobs scrolled the music list with his finger in public for the first time -- and I wasn't the only one.

Video Jobs Demoing iPhone for first time in public:

So I decided to up the ante a bit for the longterm, Apple had an Ace card. As the woo's and wow's resonated in blogospheres and hallways of corporate and consumer america in a relentless fashion never seen before, I was certain my ante was safe for the long term.  The impact was clearly evident in multiple sectors, music, phone, entertainment -- even to the distaste of some non-believing computer sector titans.

Balmer laughs as first comment to iPhone

Launch day, June 29, 2007.  Having performed my share of voluntarily marketing for the weeks and months leading up to release, my coworkers knew I would be one of those unfortuanate souls waiting in line for their purchasing opportunity. [gallery link="file" columns="2"] The last time I saw lines forming with this voracity was Microsoft's release of Windows 95.  At that time, I was too young to understand and apply Peter Lynch's investment style -- invest in what you know and are certain of, however had I, I would have reaped the benefits as Microsoft dominated the desktop and business software category the following 5 to 10 -- year over year.  That missed opportunity only served as a reminder and a lesson learned for any future opportunity -- and this may be it. This frenzy served only to convince me I am not alone, and this is a domestic occurrence for product already planed and destined for international release.  The ante must be increased -- the long term odds are too good to be true. For the weeks and months that followed, I decided to stalk the Apple stores around south Florida.  Initially I was simply a member of the of the frenzied group interested in all things Apple.  I was going at my leisure when time permitted, however in short order I realized the frenzy, post iPhone launch, simply continued.  You couldn't walk through an Apple store without saying "excuse me" at least a half a dozen times if not more just to navigate the main corridors.  I immediately questioned, is this frenzy having a halo effect on Apple and it's entire product line? Coincidentally the iPhone launch was on the last two days of Apple's fiscal quarter so the full effect, particularly the halo effect, should be recognized and felt on their next quarterly announcement. Touring the Apple stores became an interesting game of quasi-interrogation with various Apple staff and geniuses from store to store.  Questions were phrased with basic customer interest as an allegory to a relentless statistical business analyst.  Throughout the fiscal quarter, I visited each south Florida store at least twice -- shaving the last bit of doubt for an all-in wager as I was witnessing the perfect hand forming. Interestingly enough, while working at Inktel Direct, the President, Ricky Arriola, happend to give a presentation on leadership as a kick of to a series of successful internal training seminares termed "Idea" (Inktel Direct Excellence Academy) a few days prior to Apple's quarterly announcement.  Already motivated by the various topics presented, a topic which resonated was making a decision -- leaders don't teeter on a topic longer than necessary and more often than not make a decision and take direction.  This inspiration from the presentation and the highlight of that one particular topic combined with Apple quarterly announcement imminent and the bag full of statistical measures all pointing to a  royal flush, the "all in" call was a no brainer at 3:50PM before markets closed prior to Apple's after market quarterly announcement.  Chip gathering followed at 9:40AM shortly after markets open the following day.  Ironically, I must emphasize I truly don't condone or recommend any type of short term trading of this fashion as the only sure fire way to win in markets is Buffet & Lynch's style with long term solid positions. Apple was on the rise.  All throughout 2008 reaching a peak of about $200/share at end of 2007 prior to the general collapse of the markets.  As the markets collapsed, Apple, as much any company in any sector, suffered as the exodus of investors seeking a safe haven in treasuries, bonds, and other low risk fixed income investments. Are the fundamentals of Apple really affected though?

TIME magazine named iPhone invention of the year

The rumor mill for a new iPhone becomes rampant, an iPhone which connects to the faster 3G network.  The blogosphere lights up again, this time with spy fotos from China factories confirming the imminent release.  For a recession, Apple seems to be capturing all the spare attention and dollars at the expense of all other non-essential items. iPhone 3G launch day, lines abound even further. Here is a video I recorded while arriving at Aventura mall in Florida.  In a recession, lines like these convinced me to play more long term rounds in the Apple game.

iPhone 3G launch in Aventura Mall, July 7 2008

Store congestion not only continues, but actually increases as it's difficult to even walk through a store during the 2008 holiday season.  Can this long term game ever have any signs of ending?  During this time, the financial crisis is in full swing.  Henry Paulson and Bernanke are feverishly trying to get emergency liquidity approved and injected into the economy through the treasury as Bernanke had virtually exhausted all his options from a federal reserve perspective. It was literally chaos in D.C. and economically as a whole.  Ironically, while financial armageddon was occurring domestically with trickling effects internationally, Apple stores were flush full with holiday shoppers.  I'm I seeing an oxymoran here or what? Despite Apple shares suffering along side all companies, I decided to apply Lynch's & Buffet's philosophy along with the typical dollar cost averaging during the continued down turn.  The company long term is solid, it's fundamentals are solid, it's sitting on tons of cash with no debt and customers abound.  Lets start the wagers.  I don't have the full house assured in my hand, however I'm certain the turn or the river will complete my flush long term. With each down turn of $10 in share price, the ante was matched.  It was painstakingly difficult to continue this pace from $190/share through to $80/share -- but images of Buffet preaching fundamentals soothed my anxiety and gave me confidence with each submission. By the time $80/share came around I was too heavy in Apple.  Apple far outweighed my portfolio 10:1 if not 20:1 -- I needed to diversify, and no better time to do so than on the down low.  A weekend long research, steadfastly applying Buffet's value approach and some stats filtering tools putting me neck deep into P/E, debt, revenue qtr to qtr, stochastics and bollingers for hours on end,  I arrived at a solid list of fundamental stocks by Sunday evening.  Ricky's presentation echoed in my mind again -- a decision needs to be made -- should I throw new capital at the fire or simply reduce some Apple at a loss.  Buffet kept me from selling at a loss just for capital reasons -- fundamentally, Apple is too good and I barely gave it the time necessary to fulfill it's long term destiny.  Done.  Timing on late February 2009, the theoretical bottom of this recession, was purely coincidental and the long term bandwagon officially commenced. Quarter after Quarter, the sound of Apple increasing it's market share in the computer space resonated and brought a subtle smirk.  iPhone exceeding sale expectations, 3GS with video launches in mid summer brining demand so high problems with fulfilment and inventory plague Apple for weeks.  World wide launches continue in other countries where even my cousin in Uruguay is now aware of a company called Apple and their infamous iPhone.  Apple erecting stores world wide at a pace faster than people fill their gas tanks.   Wall street journal classifies Apple's brand within spitting distance of titans like Coca-Cola, Google, & Microsoft and first in regional ares such as Asia.

WSJ 9/11/2009 - Apple ranked as region's most admired multinational company

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125259938989400063.html

The explosive growth is so horrendous, for lack of a better word, Microsoft had to rethink their strategy from a full business perspective.  Ads now target Apple directly, something lacking from Microsoft now for over a two decades.  Their mobile phone strategy had to take a full about face and consider touch screens and hardware innovations as key priorities.  To get closer to the consumer, Microsoft saw the need to open resembling retail outlets -- the first opening less than a month ago on Oct 23.

Microsoft opens first retail store:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,569264,00.html

To bring finality on this growth segment, while Apple has a steadily increasing market share for computers sales currently at 8-9%, setting aside all the low end laptops and desktops sold and only considering computers in the $1k range and up, apple commands a 91% market share, up roughly 40% from their 66% the year earlier. In overall conclusion, although Apple is currently a large cap with slow stymied growth, the numbers are extremely good and investor appreciation, be it stock or dividends, are sure to materialize more long term.  It's additionally rumored, Apple will be changing the accounting rules on iPhone sales.  Instead of spreading the sale over two years, as a subsidized product by AT&T, Apple may soon start accounting for the full value upfront.  If this occurs, Apple earnings report would have a redbull injection to boot. P.S. Oh, I forgot to mention Apple is now the #1 music distributor, leapfrogging Amazon, Best Buy, Wal-Mart in roughly two to three years of massive iPod expansion and sheer dominance in portable music devices.

http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2008/04/apple-passes-wal-mart-now-1-music-retailer-in-us.ars

Are stock prices related to inflation?

Wednesday, 22 July 2009 21:47 by Michael Olivero

Since I feel we will be having higher inflation soon, I was interested in identifying the relationship between stock prices with inflationary periods from the past. I initially thought stock prices would trend upward with inflation similar to consumer products however I found this analysis pretty interesting indicating the contrary.

http://rack1.ul.cs.cmu.edu/sinflat/

 

Tags:  
Categories:   Finance
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed